Sunday, November 18, 2012

Commentary for the week ending 11-16-12

Please note:  Due to the Thanksgiving holiday, there will be no market commentary next week. 

Stocks continued the slide that began after the Presidential election as markets hit their lowest level in over four months.  For the week, the Dow was lower by 1.8%, the S&P was down 1.5%, and the Nasdaq had a return of -1.8%.  Gold moved a bit lower, returning -0.9% for the week.  Oil moved on activity in the Mid East, but only rose 0.7% on the week to $86.67 a barrel.  Brent crude closed just below $109 per barrel.
 

 
Source: Yahoo Finance

The week was similar to last as the same worries drove stocks lower.  Investors still seem to be taking gains off the table before higher tax rates likely go into effect next year.  Concerns on the “fiscal cliff” remain in the forefront while conflict in the Middle East and a recession in Europe also added to the worries. 

Fiscal cliff talks were ratcheted up this week as President Obama met with leaders from a variety of groups and concluded with Congressional members. 

Early in the week, he laid out his starting point in negotiations asking for twice as much in revenue than originally thought and continued to stress higher taxes for the wealthy.  In fact, he claimed “a modest tax increase for wealthy families wouldn’t break their back.”  The rhetoric raised the anxiety level in the markets.   

We could see more of where the White House was leaning as some of their ideas were made public.  In addition to raising taxes on those over $250,000 in income, targeted tax breaks would be eliminated.  Perhaps not surprising, the groups targeted aren’t exactly left-leaning ones.  Taxes would be increased on commodities and options traders, corporate life insurance policies, oil and gas drillers, and even golf course owners.
  
By the end of the week, Congressional leaders seemed optimistic that a deal could be reached and the market rose on the news.  Words mean little, though, and we’ll see how it plays out in the coming days and weeks. 

Also, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday that the White House may scrap the required spending cuts and instead substitute smaller targeted spending cuts.  In our view, that would only add to the uncertainty and send markets lower. 

Another worry this week was the Middle East.  After having hundreds of rockets fired into its country, Israel decided it wasn’t going to take any more.  Launching remarkably precise counter-strikes, the conflict escalated and the rhetoric from surrounding countries intensified.  

The significance of the timing should not be underestimated.  Israel’s enemies recognize that an administration that isn’t the friendliest to Israel was reelected here in the US.  These emboldened countries could spell problems in the region down the road, particularly if Iran enters the fray. 

Here in the US, economic data was mostly negative.  Retail sales fell from the previous month, manufacturing in the Mid-Atlantic showed a surprising drop, and industrial production also declined.  As expected, Hurricane Sandy bore the brunt of the blame. 

The storm was cited as the reason behind the very large increase in weekly jobless claims.  Averaging in the mid-300k range before the election, weekly jobless claims rose to 439,000 this week, a gain of 78,000 from the previous week. 

A similar story played out after Hurricane Katrina as jobless claims rose by 100,000 following the storm, returning to more normal levels the following week.  Indeed, figures from New Jersey showed a sharp increase.  However, New York showed an improvement.  More unusual was the large job losses in states like Ohio and Pennsylvania. 

Only time will tell if the storm was the culprit here, or if the economy is actually worse than it appeared. 


Next Week

Even though next week is shortened by the Thanksgiving holiday, there will be some events with the potential to move the market.  Of course a major focus will still be on progress towards averting the “fiscal cliff.”  But the market also will be looking towards Europe as the economy slows, while a few Fed members here will be speaking. 

Economic data will be rather light as we will get info on housing and the leading economic indicators. 


Investment Strategy

As we saw with the gain on Friday, the market is looking to Washington for a resolution on the fiscal cliff.  Not surprisingly, we’ll probably move higher with a deal and vice-versa on the opposite. 

A deal alone is not enough, though, as the substance of a deal will impact how much the market moves.  If we get straight tax rate increases and little spending reduction, the market will not be happy.  On the other hand, if a deal is made to increase revenue from pro growth policies and (importantly) capital gains rates don’t see a dramatic change, we should see a larger pop. 

Bearish (negative) sentiment stands at the highest level since August of 2011 according to AAII.  When that many investors are on one side of the trade, the tide often reverses course.  The market is looking oversold here.  

Of course, we could keep heading lower if headlines from Washington disappoint, so it’s not wise to try to catch a falling knife.  Friday was encouraging and if we see the market stabilizing, we like that as an opportunity to add to our stock positions. 

We’ve seen dividend stocks get hit especially hard as investors fear a tax hike next year.  Dividend stocks are investments we intend to hold for a long period, so we aren’t looking to sell at this time.  We also like smaller and mid sized stocks that don’t have a strong correlation to the market and Europe. 

Gold was reaffirmed as a favorite after the election.  We will continue the easy money policies that have fueled its rise to this point.  Continued money printing, bailouts, and stimulus around the globe will help in the long run.  Though it sold off on weaker demand this week, we aren’t looking to reduce our positions, but wouldn’t add to them, either. 

We like other commodities for the long term, especially due to weaker currencies around the globe.  A slowdown in global growth may weigh on commodity prices in the short run, though. 

The election also helped the bond sector.  Though Treasury bonds yields aren’t at their historic lows (where prices were near historic highs), the trend is moving back that direction.  A short position (bet on a decline in price) provides a nice hedge here but we believe the potential for profit is low at this time.

On the bond theme, we think TIPs are important as we still expect inflation to increase. Municipal bonds also work as higher taxes loom on the horizon (try to avoid muni funds and buy the actual bond if possible), though our concern has increased as the pace of distressed municipalities is increasing. 

Finally, in international stocks, we are less enthusiastic on developed markets, but not totally sold on emerging, either. 

These day-to-day and week-to-week fluctuations have little impact on positions we intend to hold for several years or longer.  Our short and medium term investments are the only positions affected by these daily and weekly fluctuations. 


This commentary is for informational purposes and is not investment advice, an indicator of future performance, a solicitation, an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation for any security. It should not be used as a primary basis for making investment decisions. Consider your own financial circumstances and goals carefully before investing. Past performance cannot guarantee results.


Sunday, November 11, 2012

Commentary for the week ending 11-9-12

Stocks didn’t appear happy with the election results, selling off sharply for the worst week in five months.  For the week, the Dow dropped 2.1%, the S&P fell 2.4%, and the Nasdaq plunged 2.6%.  Gold rose firmly on the likelihood of continued easy money policies, rising 3.4% on the week.  Oil saw some large moves, closing the week with a modest gain of 1.4% to just over $86 a barrel.  The foreign Brent crude, used in much of our gas here in the East, closed shy of $110.   

Source: Yahoo Finance

Well, at least it’s over.  That’s one of the few positives we took from the election.  The market wasn’t happy, either, as stocks saw their worst day of the year.  The Dow fell more than 300 points, or 2.4%, on Wednesday alone.  Maybe that was an improvement, seeing that the market dropped over 5% the day after President Obama’s first victory. 

Like many others, we didn’t think the market would see such strong moves on the election results.  Perhaps more people than it appeared were looking for a Romney win. 

The election did draw attention to several problems facing us in the near future.  We think the foremost reason for the decline in stocks was the tax outlook. 

With the reelection, it is virtually certain that taxes will rise next year, whether it is income, cap gains, dividends, or estate taxes, or new taxes related to the health care law.  That gives investors a reason to sell now and take gains while taxes are lower.  It is a primary reason why high-flying stocks like Apple were hit this week.

The reelection also meant a continuation of gridlock in government.  This is a concern with the looming tax increases and spending cuts, commonly referred to as the “fiscal cliff” in the press. 

We saw this week a desire amongst politicians to work together to avoid this cliff.  However, the difference in approaches remains apparent as the rhetoric has not changed.  Short-sighted politicians believe a simple rate hike on the wealthy will cure our fiscal ills (we saw the market drop immediately on Friday with similar remarks from the President).

However, a more comprehensive reform is needed.  For the tax side of the argument, history has shown us time and again, raising tax rates actually results in lower revenue to the government.  Reforms that promote growth have been proven to result in higher revenues.  Hopefully any agreement will lean in this direction. 

Regardless, we think even a temporary fix to buy time will be welcomed by the market.  A fundamental, pro-growth reform would be even better. 

Another consequence of the election is a continuation of the Fed’s easy-money and stimulative policies.  While the market has risen with stimulus, it is a negative in the long run. 

It is also another wrinkle that investment managers like us must consider for our portfolios.  Figuring out fundamentals like the direction of corporate earnings and economic strength are difficult enough.  Adding another layer of unpredictability with the economic central-planners at central banks makes investors even more reluctant to invest.

Lastly, the hope for any rollback of regulations has been eliminated.  Whether it is costly rules from Dodd-Frank, the healthcare law, or even EPA regulations, these programs will create another headwind for the economy. 

It wasn’t just the election that weighed on the market this week.  Problems in Europe are back in the headlines. 

Business activity and industrial production in the Euro zone has fallen sharply and estimates for the future have been revised lower.  Particularly worrisome is that Germany, the workhorse of the region, is included in the negative outlook.  There are few bright spots in the region and bad news is likely to persist. 


Next Week

Next week looks to be much quieter than the previous weeks.  The pace of corporate earnings has fallen off as the lackluster earnings season has wound down.  There will be a few economic reports, including inflation on the producer and consumer level (PPI and CPI), as well as info on retail sales and industrial production. 

The focus next week will likely continue be on information coming out of Europe, as well as talk on the fiscal cliff issues here at home. 


Investment Strategy

We underestimated the reaction in the market to the election.  At this time, it looks like the market is more focused on macro issues like the fiscal cliff.  As mentioned above, if a fix is in the works, the market is likely to rally, but the reverse is also true. 

Problems in Europe are another focus, which is a concern any time they are in the headlines. 

As the market moves lower, it looks more and more oversold, meaning we think there is more room for the market to move higher.  That said, there is no telling how the fiscal situation will work out, nor the Euro story.  It might not hurt to nibble, but caution is warranted. 

There is no change in the investments we favor at this time, though different sectors will benefit based on the election.  We still like large cap higher-quality and dividend paying stocks.  Smaller and little-known stocks with low correlation to the market (and Europe) are also promising.  There is always the opportunity to find an undervalued individual stock at any time, as well.

Gold was reaffirmed as a favorite after the election.  We will continue the easy money policies that have fueled its rise to this point.  Continued money printing, bailouts, and stimulus around the globe will help in the long run.  We wouldn’t add to positions at this point, but would not look to sell, either.

We like other commodities for the long term, especially due to weaker currencies around the globe.  A slowdown in global growth may weigh on commodity prices in the short run, though. 

The election also helped the bond sector.  Though Treasury bonds yields aren’t at their historic lows (where prices were near historic highs), the trend is moving back that direction.  A short position (bet on a decline in price) provides a nice hedge here but we believe the potential for profit is low at this time.

On the bond theme, we think TIPs are important as we still expect inflation to increase. Municipal bonds also work and there are some nice yielding bonds out there now (try to avoid muni funds and buy the actual bond if possible), though our concern has increased as the pace of distressed municipalities is increasing.  Additionally, higher taxes have increased the attractiveness of these bonds. 

Finally, in international stocks, we are less enthusiastic on developed markets, but not totally sold on emerging, either. 

These day-to-day and week-to-week fluctuations have little impact on positions we intend to hold for several years or longer.  Our short and medium term investments are the only positions affected by these daily and weekly fluctuations. 


This commentary is for informational purposes and is not investment advice, an indicator of future performance, a solicitation, an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation for any security. It should not be used as a primary basis for making investment decisions. Consider your own financial circumstances and goals carefully before investing. Past performance cannot guarantee results.

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Commentary for the week ending 11-2-12

An unusual week with only three trading days closed with mixed results.  Through the close Friday, the Dow fell slightly, off 0.1%, the S&P rose 0.2%, and the Nasdaq returned -0.2%.  A stronger dollar sent most commodities lower, with gold falling 2.2%.  Providing some relief at the gas pump, oil was also lower, down 1.7% to just under $85 per barrel.  The foreign Brent crude, used in much of our gas here in the East, closed at $105 per barrel.

Source: Yahoo Finance

Extraordinary circumstances related to the storm in the Northeast closed the stock market both Monday and Tuesday.  More importantly to us, it showed how ill-prepared the New York Stock Exchange is to handle disasters of this magnitude. 

We wondered why backup plans were not in place, especially after the September 11th attack.  Even having an alternative location makes sense to us so another closure like this (or worse) does not happen.

Trading resumed on Wednesday and by all accounts, the day seemed pretty normal.  The storm did give a boost to several sectors, like construction and home improvement stores, like Home Depot.  On the other hand, many sectors were obviously hurt by the storm, like retailers. 

Keynesian economists think events like the storm are beneficial in a sense, because it boosts economic activity due to the rebuilding that is needed.  Indeed, there are some that believe we could see a boost in GDP from it.  And that’s entirely possible. 

But looking at an event like the storm in that way is severely flawed.  It doesn’t consider the wealth destroyed.  Nor does it consider that the spending on rebuilding is taken away from other sectors that it otherwise would have been spent on. 

The storm will also distort economic numbers over the next few months, not giving us an accurate view of the overall economy.  We can already see the excuses on earnings reports coming from companies.  Any negative earnings will be blamed on the storm, regardless of that even being the case. 

As for the market this week, stocks jumped on Thursday due to better than expected economic data.  Manufacturing in the US showed a slight tick higher, though still shows extremely slow growth.  Retail sales improved and consumer confidence stood at its highest level since 2008. 

While that was cited as the reason for the large market gain on Thursday, we think it has more to do with the calendar.  Though we have not seen it recently, the first of the month often sees new inflows into the market, pushing it higher.  This was also the beginning of a new fiscal year in many cases.  Higher than normal trading volume and the subsequent market drop on Friday supports this idea. 

This week we also received data on the employment picture, which was highly anticipated after the blowout figures last month. 

The economy added 171,000 jobs over the past month, better than expected, though still woefully short of a figure we should see in a normal recovery.  The unemployment rate ticked higher to 7.9% from 7.8%, while a broader measure of unemployment, the U-6, stood at 14.6%.  Employment seems to be improving, but still has a long way to go. 

As for corporate earnings, three-quarters of the S&P 500 companies have released their numbers so far.  Growth in earnings is basically flat, while a majority have still come in below revenue estimates.  We would like to see the earnings picture improve before we get too optimistic on the future. 


Next Week

Next week is all about the election.  We will get some corporate earnings and economic data on the strength of the service sector, import and export prices, and consumer sentiment, but they will have a negligible impact on the market, at best. 

Will the market move next week based on the election outcome?  Most likely.  But we aren’t sure which way the market would go regardless of the outcome, at least in the short term. 


The Election

Contrary to many others in our industry, we don’t see the election outcome having a significant difference on the markets over the coming years.  While there are considerable differences in the candidates and the direction they will take the country, the stock market often doesn’t correlate with these underlying fundamentals. 

A Romney presidency is largely seen as being friendlier to business.  And it likely will be.  But that doesn’t necessarily mean it will be good for the stock market. 

We believe the stimulus policies from the Fed, with their extremely low interest rates and the printing of nearly two trillion dollars, has fueled the rise in the markets.  A Romney presidency would rightly tighten these policies, but may hurt the market in the meantime.  However, it would be a positive in the long run. 

An Obama presidency will impose more headwinds to businesses and the economy.  Faced with those headwinds, though, it is extremely likely that the Fed will pump more stimulus into the economy, continuing this giant Keynesian experiment.  One only has to look at Japan, with their never-ending stimuli and stagnant growth over the last 20 years, to see how this will play out. 

As the benefit from each stimulus has less and less impact, it is a worrisome path to take.  Yet the market may rise with more stimulus – until it will inevitably come crashing down.  Who knows when that will happen, though. 

Though it may likely be a wash for the stock market in general, under the different administrations, certain sectors will perform better than others:

    Romney victory:  Consumer staples, Health care, Financials, and the Dollar.
    Obama victory:  Technology, Telecom, Commodities, Gold, and Bonds.


Investment Strategy


The market may have room to move lower from here, but it is looking more and more oversold as it does.  However, next week will likely be quiet until after the election.  It’s anyone’s guess as to how the market will react once we learn the outcome. 

It may not be worth taking much of a gamble here in the short run.  We’d like to see a larger sell-off before committing more money, but it might not hurt to cautiously nibble. 

There is no change in the investments we favor at this time, though as we discussed above, different sectors will benefit based on the election.  We still like large cap higher-quality and dividend paying stocks.  Smaller and little-known stocks with low correlation to the market (and Europe) are also promising.  There is always the opportunity to find an undervalued individual stock at any time, as well.

Gold is a longer-term favorite, as it will do well with the global money printing, additional bailouts, and stimulus programs.  We wouldn’t add to positions at this point, but would not look to sell, either.

We like other commodities for the long term, especially due to money printing around the globe.  A slowdown in global growth may weigh on commodity prices in the short run. 

Treasury bonds yields have moved off their historic lows (where prices were near historic highs), as the new stimulus program shifted its attention from these bonds towards mortgage bonds.  We wouldn’t consider the trend to be changing, for a continuation of the current Operation Twist (that has kept Treasury yields low and prices high and is set to expire at the end of the year) is likely.  A short position (bet on a decline in price) provides a nice hedge here but we believe the potential for profit is low at this time.

On the bond theme, we think TIPs are important as we still expect inflation to increase. Municipal bonds also work and there are some nice yielding bonds out there now (try to avoid muni funds and buy the actual bond if possible), though our concern has increased as the pace of distressed municipalities is increasing.  Additionally, higher taxes from the health care law will increase the attractiveness of these bonds in the future.

Finally, in international stocks, we are less enthusiastic on developed markets, but not totally sold on emerging, either. 

These day-to-day and week-to-week fluctuations have little impact on positions we intend to hold for several years or longer.  Our short and medium term investments are the only positions affected by these daily and weekly fluctuations. 


This commentary is for informational purposes and is not investment advice, an indicator of future performance, a solicitation, an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation for any security. It should not be used as a primary basis for making investment decisions. Consider your own financial circumstances and goals carefully before investing. Past performance cannot guarantee results.